RTI or Right to information Act 2005 stands for Right To Information and has been given the status of a fundamental right under Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution. It has been able to bypass the iron curtain of Official Secrets Act 1923.
Article 19 under which every citizen has freedom of speech and expression and have the right to know how the government works, what role does it play, what are its functions and so on. It has something to do with Government. So apart from Govt Departments like, say, Ministry of Human Resources, it is also applicable to panchayat office, Govt Co like Indian Oil, ONGC,West Bengal Industrial Dev Corpn Ltd. etc.
The term which has been used in appropriate competent authority and appropriate Govt in the Act - from whom information can be sought. As such competent authority and appropriate Govt includes President of India, Governor of India,Chief Justice of India (SC and High court), Speaker of Loksabha and Assembly.
e.g. RTI activists has been able to get qualification of MPs even from the speaker of Loksabha.
Article 21 talks about Protection Of Life And Personal Liberty. No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.
RTI is not applicable to a Pvt Co, say, ITC directly. But the information can received indirectly. However Section 2(f) says information includes information relating to any Pvt body which can be accessed by a public authority. e.g. you can ask Excise deptt how much Excise is paid by ITC, you can ask IT Deptt what are the assets declared by, say, Amitabh Bachchan in his Income Tax return.
The basic object of the Right to Information Act is to empower the citizens,promote transparency and accountability in the working of the Government and utilization of public money.We have 3 tier Govt - Central, State and Local body. Anybody or deptt which is funded or established directly or indirectly by public money (e.g. all District Magistrate[DM] and their office) is answerable to us. Analogically just like a maid servant appointed in our house , is answerable to us, so are the DMs. That is why all political organization should be under RTI (they are not paying any Tax - so indirectly funded by us - e.g. Congress is paying a token rent of only Rs 10,000 for a property valued at few crores).RTI activists are trying to include them under the purview of RTI.
Some popular RTI queries are : Passport delay, Income Tax Refund,copies of answer sheet,FIR status, Scholarship,Employee Provident fund transfer or withdrawal status , recruitment policy of a PSU,compensation for land etc.
It is a two tier Act - State level and Central level. Therefore it has two tier jurisdiction depending upon whether it pertains to State or Centre. For example in case of Central Govt Deptt prepoer forum is CIC.
The procedures:
1. Apply to PIO or Public Information Officer. In case of Central Govt Organization it is called Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer in case of State Govt organization. In my Co ( Govt Co - under Companies Act 2013) Company Secretary is the PIO. One can write just PIO instead of writing the name. PIO is appointed u/s 5 of the Act.
However in case of Vishwabharati / IIT / office of President of India PIO is PIO and not CPIO.
However in case of Vishwabharati / IIT / office of President of India PIO is PIO and not CPIO.
2. It should be accompanied by Indian Postal order/ Non judicial stamp paper/ Demand draft or Banker's Chq /Court fees of Rs 10 in West Bengal. It is Rs 10 in most of the states.No fee for BPL. Some states do not accept Demand Draft etc. In case of DD there is a practical problem "Payable to whom?". Indian Postal order is universally acceptable in all the states.
3. The Indian Postal order ideally should not contain the name of the company unless you are sure. Even if IPO is blank (ie not endorsed) PIO is obliged to fill it up himself and not harass the information seeker on frivolous grounds. In some companies PIO wrongly return back the IPO saying it is not endorsed (meaning the name is not mentioned in IPO).
4. Ideal format - with this format email may be given
5. PIO has to reply maximum within 30 days. However in case of life and liberty it should be maximum 48 hours. e.g. in case of a senior citizen staying alone in Salt Lake (say), even denial of restoration of telephone line or gas connection can be covered under 48 hours clause. This term life and liberty can be interpreted depending upon facts and circumstances of the case and cannot be compartmentalized. Everything is left to your interpretation - though it can be challenged.
6. Information is sought under section 6 of RTI Act 2005.
7. If PIO thinks he can ask for IPO ( or other mode ) of higher value to recover cost - but it cannot be a ground of delay. Both the process should go parallely.
8. PIO can reject the RTI on the ground of section 8(1) of RTI Act 2005, because it is confidential commercial information (In fact in my Co one case was rejected under section 8 of RTI Act) or sensitive information which is likely to hinder social fabric or provocative information which can jeopardize national integrity (e.g. no. of Policeman deployed in Babri Masjid).
However under section 8(2) if public interest warrants divulging such information, then it can be published. e.g. Singur case agreement was open for 4 days before it was withdrawn on the intervention of Ratan Tata.
But under section 8(3) it can be divulged after 20 years by Govt. , if it thinks, it is fit to do so.
9. Process of application :
10. If applicant is not happy with the answer or question is rejected altogether, then applicant can appeal to Appellate Authority(AA). In my office, AA is the Managing Director.
In RTI, SPIO is the most important person and 1st Appellate Authority is the weakest point in the chain. It needs to be strengthened.
11. If you are not happy with the order of AA then your 2nd appeal lies to Information commission - in case of state to State Information Commission or SIC (or CIC in case of C Govt related question).
Appeal can be made under section 19 of RTI Act 2005.
12. Appeal vs Complaints
In the following cases ,
under section 18
of RTI Act 2005, complain can be
made directly to the Information Commission.
13. If PIO does not give information and is adjudged guilty then he has to pay a fine of Rs 250 per day subject to a maximum of Rs 25,000. However habitual defaulter can even be terminated.
14. The role of PIO is to give information and pass on information to the concerned deptt for a suitable reply. If PIO has documentary evendience that information has not been given by the concerned department - then the deptt will be held guilty and not the PIO. Under RTI there is nothing called internal document unless it falls under section 8. Information supplied by a department can be supplied to the information seeker in verbatim. In 2006 the Congress tried to bring an amendment to exclude file notings from the Acts purview, but thankfully the Act has not been enacted.
15. PIO has to submit Quarterly Statistics and Quarterly return to CIC.
16. State Chief Information Commissioner under section 19(8) read with section 20 of RTI Act may instruct a Company to follow the rules which they are not following, failing which penal provision may be applicable.
17. Proactive disclosure - U/s 4(1)(b) is required. There are 17 points under this sub section – information in respect of which needs to be given in the website.
- this disclosure will reduce the number of RTI Applications and many RTI Applications may be disposed of referring to the website.
18. It may be mentioned here that stress may be given on Record Management. Proper Record Management system be prepared, which will classify the period for which various documents need to be maintained, otherwise records will have to be maintained for ever.
e.g. If it is classified the certain records (e.g. Tender Documents) are to be kept for 5 years, then general public cannot ask for documents, beyond that, under RTI. In absence of this record management system, we might have to give Tender Document to RTI applicants since inception.
The Bengal Records Manual 1943 may be looked into. It inter alia says that Class A records will contain papers to be permanently preserved, Class B records will contain papers to be destroyed after 12 years, and Class C records will contain papers that need not be kept for more than 3 years (e.g. Peon’s leave rules).
19. If you give information in the website, you can simply refer the RTI applicant to the website.
20. Public servant’s salary should be in public domain.
21. SPIO should mention the name of Appellate Authority u/s 7 (8) of RTI Act, where the appeal can be preferred , whenever information request has been rejected. While rejecting an RTI , grounds of rejection must be explained in the reply.
22. CJI, Shri Ranjan Gogoi has given verdict that Supreme Court is also under RTI Act.
23. Information means whatever is recorded in file. It does not mean creation of information. In other words, if RTI information seeker asks for data, which has to be created before for them, it ought to be refused.
24. Section 22 of RTI Act says it overwrites any other Act.
25. SCIC or CIC can evoke Section 22 of RTI Act. e.g. a Govt. Servant can appeal to CAT to ask for ACR, where promotion has been denied. SCIC can ignore Section 8 of RTI Act and instruct the Department u/s 22 of RTI Act, give copy of ACR. In one particular case, promotion was granted on the basis of ACR.
26. CIC or SCIC is not a Court of Justice.
27. SPIO may seek assistance of any other officer of the same Department u/s 5(4) of RTI Act for proper discharge of his duties, then such other officer will be deemed to be SPIO u/s 5(5) of RTI Act and will be responsible for contravention.
28. If any information sought pertains to another Department, the fact should be mentioned to the applicant and transfer the application or relevant part of the application to that public authority u/s 6(3) of RTI Act, instead of just returning it back to the applicant
29.If the information sought is so voluminous that it would obstruct normal work or disproportionately divert resource of the public authority, then u/s 7(9) of RTI Act , it can be denied. e.g. in a village school, where there only 2 office bearer, if last 15 years data relating to meeting etc is sought.In my office, it is sometimes found, some people are asking 31 questions, not related to each other and had to be refused.
30.U/s 11 of RTI Act, 3rd party information can be denied. This is a very tricky section. If 3rd party request beforehand that certain information cannot be given then it may be followed by the Commission/SPIO. A person should not go to SCIC/CIC, before approaching Appellate Authority.
31. RTI can override Office Secret Act.
32. Municipal Chairman can’t be Appellate Authority, since he is not an Officer as per RTI Act
33. NGO who gets fund from Govt. also comes under RTI.
34. If a person is custodian of certain records, he cannot be held responsible, if during charge handover and take over, his list of files does include that.
35.Online RTI reply is not recognized under RTI Rules in WB till date. Though online query followed by manual copy is acceptable
36.Under Article 166(3) of Constitution Governor can make business Rules e.g. record manual, secretariat manual. Point 35 can be done by Govermor under this clause.
37. IPO received should be deposited in bank. Court fee stamp goes to state treasury , so it need not be re-used
For any help one can take the help of RTI activist Mr. Amitava Choudhury based in Kolkata at 9836 10 76 24 or 9433 70 76 24 - amitavachoudhury.cal@gmail.com. He can be approached for any help - personally or professionally. Without his help, this article could not have been written.
https://onlinerti.com/
http://www.righttoinformation.gov.in/
https://rtionline.gov.in/
